What The Row Size Numbers Mean: Margaux 10, 12, 15 and Beyond
Most luxury houses reach for adjectives when they name their sizes. You are offered a Mini, a Small, a Medium and, when the house is feeling expansive, a Jumbo, and not one of those words commits to anything you can measure. Across a large part of its line The Row does something quietly different, and the moment you notice it the catalogue becomes much easier to read. The number in a model name is the width of the bag, in inches. Margaux 10 comes in at ten inches across. Margaux 12 comes in at twelve. That single fact does more real work than any amount of styling copy, and it is the through-line of this explainer.
The system runs further than the flagship alone. It covers Margaux 10, 12, 15 and 17, India 10.00, 12.00 and 15.75, Agnes 12 and 15, Sofia 8.75 and 10, and Marlo 12 and 14. The decimals are the giveaway: nobody writes 15.75 unless the figure is intended literally. Below: how far the rule goes, where it bends, what the number leaves out, and how to turn it into a decision when you are choosing between two sizes of the same bag.
The rule, spelled out
Take the number in the name, append the word inches, and you have the width of the bag. That is the system in full, applied consistently enough across the numbered families that it is fair to treat as a rule rather than a coincidence. It is unusually plain labelling, since it closes the gap between what a size sounds like and what it measures. A Small at one house can be roomier than a Medium at another, yet ten inches is ten inches anywhere. For anyone measuring The Row bags against something https://therowbags.org/tote-bags/ already in the wardrobe, it turns the comparison into arithmetic rather than guessing. That is also why the brand can offer four sizes of one silhouette and confuse nobody.
| Model name | The size number, as width | Dimensions as published (W x H x D) |
|---|---|---|
| Soft Margaux 10 | 10 in | 10 x 7 x 7.5 in |
| Soft Margaux 12 | 12 in | 12 x 9 x 7.5 in |
| Soft Margaux 15 | 15 in | Width by name; measurements not listed |
| Margaux Shoulder 12 | 12 in per the name | 14.75 x 9 x 5 in, the exception that breaks the rule |
| Margaux 17 | 17 in | Roughly 17 x 12 x 9 in |
| India 10.00 | 10 in | Not listed officially |
| India 12.00 | 12 in | Not listed officially |
| India 15.75 | 15.75 in | Not published officially |
| Agnes 12 | 12 in | Width by name only |
| Agnes 15 | 15 in | Width by name only |
| Marlo 12 | 12 in | Width by name only |
| Marlo 14 | 14 in | Width from the name only |
| Sofia 8.75 | 8.75 in | Archive model, not officially listed |
| Sofia 10 | 10 in | Archive model; no official listing |
What the number leaves unsaid
Width is only one of three dimensions, and the other two scale with it in no predictable way to speak of. Take the two Soft Margaux sizes that have official figures behind them, since the 10 measures 10 x 7 x 7.5 in and the 12 measures 12 x 9 x 7.5 in. The depth is identical at 7.5 inches, so the larger bag is no proportional enlargement of the smaller one. The height changes, gaining two inches, and so does the width, by the same amount. What that means in use is that a size up brings a taller opening and more length rather than extra depth. Anyone assuming the 12 will swallow twice as much as the 10 will find the difference slighter than the numbers imply.
The handle drop is constant as well, at five inches on both Soft Margaux sizes, and that is another thing the model number never tells you. Five inches is a hand-carry or crook-of-the-elbow drop rather than a shoulder one, and both sizes ship with a removable shoulder strap to handle the rest. Interior fittings differ between them as well: the 10 has a single card slot while the 12 adds a second plus a zip pocket. Day to day, details like those decide more than an inch of width. Read the number to place the bag on a scale, then read the specification to know how it behaves.
The Margaux Shoulder 12, where the rule bends
A single current model breaks the pattern, and it deserves to be said clearly rather than quietly. A twelve sits in the name of the Margaux Shoulder 12, but the brand gives its dimensions as 14.75 x 9 x 5 in. Because the width in the name and the width in the specification disagree, the number is doing the job of a family size rather than a literal external measurement on this one. It squares with the silhouette itself, a reworked shape with elongated tubular handles and narrowed gusseted side panels rather than a plain scaling-up of the tote. The lesson generalises: treat the number as a starting point, then confirm against published dimensions before you commit. Where a listing gives no dimensions at all, treat the number as an indication rather than a measurement.
What each width actually holds
Translating inches into daily use is the step most guides leave out. Anything under ten inches wide is a phone, cardholder, keys and lipstick affair, the domain of the Sofia 8.75 and the small clutches. At ten inches you have the textbook small day bag, taking a compact wallet, a phone, sunglasses and a slim pouch without distortion. Twelve inches is the point where a bag begins absorbing a paperback, a small notebook, a folded scarf and a full-size wallet all at once. A working width is fourteen to fifteen inches, the point at which documents and a tablet stop being a squeeze. At seventeen inches, as on the Margaux 17, you are into weekend and travel country rather than everyday use.
- 8.75 to 10 in: evenings, errands and anything where the bag should disappear.
- 12 in: the most versatile width on offer and the one most buyers end up choosing.
- 14 to 15 in: work, travel to work and days when other people’s things travel with you.
- 17 in: travel and staying over, where soft structure is a feature and not a compromise.
Price follows width, though material moves faster
Size and price track each other, though not as sharply as you might expect. Take observed 2026 market prices: the Soft Margaux 10 sits at $3,650 and the Soft Margaux 12 at $4,350, so two inches of width costs around $700. Marlo 12 is observed at $3,600 and $4,900 depending on the version, and Marlo 14 at $5,300, a far bigger step for the same two inches. Bigger leaps come from material than from size: India 10.00 is $3,850 in leather against $5,370 in suede, while Agnes 15 runs $5,000 in leather, $5,800 in suede and $4,300 in a canvas blend. With Agnes 12 at $4,400, the leather Agnes 15 is only $600 more for three additional inches. If you are optimising spend, the material is the bigger financial decision and the width is the bigger practical one.
The bags that carry no number
Plenty of the line falls outside the system, and confusion begins when the two conventions get mixed. Words rather than inches govern the Park Tote family, which runs Small, Medium, Large and XL alongside the N/S Park Tote and Park Tote Three. The 90’s Bag, the Half Moon and the Bourse Clutch are small bags named without any size marker at all. For those, dimensions are the only guide: the Bourse Clutch is listed at 10.2 x 6.5 x 2.3 in, while the Half Moon is given officially as 8 x 13.5 x 2.5 in, with other listings differing enough that the figure is safest treated as approximate. Archive models follow no rule either, with the Camden measuring roughly 9 x 12.5 x 5.25 in despite having no number. Orientation shorthand is what the N/S and E/W prefixes provide, widely read as north-south for taller shapes and east-west for wider ones.
Making the decision from the inches
The practical value of a literal sizing system is that it can be verified before you buy. Measure a bag you already own and like, then compare its width to the number in the model name you have in mind. Do the same for the widest thing you routinely carry, whether that is a laptop, a folder or a water bottle, and add an inch of tolerance for the soft sides. Keep in mind that most of these are unstructured shapes, which is why a bag looks smaller empty and fuller in use than any flat measurement lets on. When you are between sizes on a soft silhouette, the smaller one tends to look better and the larger one tends to work better. That trade-off, not the number itself, is the real choice in front of you when you buy row handbags in a numbered family.